<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Miscellaneous Heathen : "The Barack Obama of Automobiles"</title>
    <link>http://new.mischeathen.com/articles/2008/06/15/the-barack-obama-of-automobiles.rss</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Snark Redux</description>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on "The Barack Obama of Automobiles" by your attorney</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;greetings from London. Make sure and check out protests in Belgium tomorrow about oil. They were putting up tank baracades and barbed wire this morning on the way to Toal HQ. Was just lamenting my big push rod motor. Electric cars are interesting but I wonder if that really helps environment as most electricity uses GASP! Petroleum to produce it, and nasty shit too, No 6 Fuel oil. Dirtier than the diesel in my 92 dodge truck.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:23:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:83f6399e-61ef-4a4e-a70a-0e91d6dfbb56</guid>
      <link>http://new.mischeathen.com/articles/2008/06/15/the-barack-obama-of-automobiles#comment-815</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on "The Barack Obama of Automobiles" by Chet</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think the point -- which is in the story, IIRC -- is that an electric-priority hybrid vehicle like the Volt might or might not be dependent on a dirty fuel for its main drive. It gives you an option that doesn't exist with current hybrids or traditional internal combustion/combustion ignition vehicles. I think that's smart.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:34:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:0634123d-c1a8-4899-ab72-9df3761faad2</guid>
      <link>http://new.mischeathen.com/articles/2008/06/15/the-barack-obama-of-automobiles#comment-816</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on "The Barack Obama of Automobiles" by your attorney</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;barack obama of automobiles? so does it drive in all 57 states? Bwahahahahaha &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:34:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:26562af4-950f-42e2-b095-4fc50728f108</guid>
      <link>http://new.mischeathen.com/articles/2008/06/15/the-barack-obama-of-automobiles#comment-817</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on "The Barack Obama of Automobiles" by your attorney</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;true it could be run on Nuclear power plants. The other side to the equation is how much energy/resources does it take to build a new car versus and old. In other words, driving and maintaining that sweet porsche until you die likely would use less energy than the benefit of driving an ultra efficient new car. My biggest problem would be that there isno sound from the motor, I guess they could just sync a soundtrack from say a chevy small block...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:26:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:59d9bf59-dc0c-40b2-a5b7-7364e1a97ce3</guid>
      <link>http://new.mischeathen.com/articles/2008/06/15/the-barack-obama-of-automobiles#comment-823</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
